IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katherine Kasica Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-07-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 1 3 0.120 0.0193 0.0193 — —
2018-19 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 6 12 0.480 0.0771 0.0771 — —
2019-20 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 22 0 3 3 0.136 0.0219 0.0219 — —
2020-21 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 20 2 5 7 0.350 0.0562 0.0562 — —
2021-22 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 26 1 4 5 0.192 0.0309 0.0309 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Harvard D1 ECAC-W SR 33 1 1 2 0.061
2024-25 Harvard D1 ECAC-W JR 27 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Harvard D1 ECAC-W SO 30 0 3 3 0.100
2022-23 Harvard D1 ECAC-W FR 30 0 1 1 0.033
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2022-23 · Harvard
-28.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6029
Defenseman overall
#606
Defenseman born in 2004
#5478
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Xylia Lang
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Rachel Herzog
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Carlson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Heather Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
McKenzie Sederberg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Xylia Lang
Lindenwood ·
0.091 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Rachel Herzog
St. Cloud State ·
0.056 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Carlson
RIT ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.