← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cali Cerruti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 32 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 33 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 30 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 32 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Shattuck-St. Mary's 19U 19U-AAA-W 55 3 14 17 0.309 0.1068 0.1068
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Providence D1 HEA-W 35 0 2 2 0.057
2024-25 Providence D1 HEA-W 33 0 1 1 0.030
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2024-25 · Providence
-71.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5221
Defenseman overall
#486
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ RPI (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bemidji State ·
0.077 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Union ·
0.324 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Clarkson ·
0.171 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.