Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Roseau High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 0.500 | 0.0755 | 0.0755 |
| 2022-23 | Roseau High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 28 | 15 | 17 | 32 | 1.143 | 0.1726 | 0.1726 |
| 2023-24 | Roseau High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 31 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 1.161 | 0.1754 | 0.1754 |
| 2024-25 | Roseau High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 28 | 22 | 18 | 40 | 1.429 | 0.2157 | 0.2157 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Cloud State | WCHA-W | FR | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.143 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Guagliardo | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG | 0.156 | Mercyhurst |
| Katie Detert | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG | 0.000 | St. Cloud State |
| Mariah Gardner | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG | 0.071 | Minnesota State |
| Abby Halluska | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG | 0.314 | Bemidji State |
| Gabby Billing | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG | 0.310 | Dartmouth |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellie Newpower | 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG | 0.679 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Gracyn Knowles | 2024-25 · 0.92 PPG | 0.548 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Ella Konrad | 2024-25 · 0.74 PPG | 0.700 | Nazareth | UCHC |
| Jenna Allen | 2023-24 · 0.93 PPG | 0.586 | Augsburg | MIAC |
| McKenzie Keller | 2022-23 · 2.21 PPG | 0.238 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.