IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Suzy Higuchi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-10 Country: Japan
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 1 11 12 0.480 0.0771 0.0771 — —
2019-20 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 23 9 8 17 0.739 0.1187 0.1187 — —
2020-21 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 20 13 13 26 1.300 0.2088 0.2088 — —
2021-22 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 26 26 24 50 1.923 0.3088 0.3088 — —
2022-23 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 27 32 36 68 2.518 0.4045 0.4045 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC-W — 9 0 1 1 0.111
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC-W — 23 2 4 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2023-24 · Yale
-16.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1727
Forward overall
#59
Forward born in 2004
#113
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Katie Rooney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Darby Dodds
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Katie Rooney
RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Darby Dodds
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.