IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mika Cichosz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Albert Lea High (W) USHS-MN-W 19 2 2 4 0.210 0.0338 0.0338 — —
2021-22 Albert Lea High (W) USHS-MN-W 26 15 12 27 1.038 0.1668 0.1668 — —
2022-23 Albert Lea High (W) USHS-MN-W 28 31 12 43 1.536 0.2466 0.2466 — —
2023-24 Albert Lea High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 22 14 36 1.333 0.2141 0.2141 — —
2024-25 Albert Lea High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 39 24 63 2.333 0.3747 0.3747 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 38 0 1 1 0.026
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W FR 38 0 1 1 0.026
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2025-26 · Minnesota
-91.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#359
Defenseman overall
#52
Defenseman born in 2007
#180
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Taylor Marchin
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Yale (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Wright
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Kelly
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Kilponen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Briana Mastel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Marchin
Yale ·
0.207 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Wright
Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Kelly
Dartmouth ·
0.208 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.