← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dallon Melin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1106 0.1283 0.3089 0.3585
2018-19 Red Deer Rebels WHL 34 1 2 3 0.088 0.0429 0.0469 0.2161 0.2365
2019-20 Red Deer Rebels WHL 63 8 9 17 0.270 0.1313 0.1313 0.6611 0.6611
2020-21 Red Deer Rebels WHL 23 2 4 6 0.261 0.1269 0.1269 0.6393 0.6393
2021-22 Red Deer Rebels WHL 67 11 13 24 0.358 0.1743 0.1637 0.8777 0.8243
2022-23 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 67 16 25 41 0.612 0.2977 0.2657 1.4993 1.3382
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara D1 AHA JR 29 5 6 11 0.379
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2025-26 · Niagara
+97.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25283
Forward overall
#1417
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.