IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Duffy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-03-21 Country: USA
2005 · Round 4, Pick #104  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EJHL 56 21 20 41 0.732 0.2169 0.2290 — —
2004-05 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EJHL 54 19 26 45 0.833 0.2469 0.2492 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 39 7 10 17 0.436
2007-08 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 30 6 2 8 0.267
2006-07 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 39 5 5 10 0.256
2005-06 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 27 3 5 8 0.296
2005-06 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2004-05 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 11 2 0 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2004-05 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
-15.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5141
Defenseman overall
#794
Defenseman born in 1986
#108
in EJHL

D1 Comparables

Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.