IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Woods Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — NAHL 58 4 10 14 0.241 0.0896 0.0964 0.2556 0.2749
2012-13 Lincoln Stars USHL 57 6 12 18 0.316 0.2011 0.1984 0.9464 0.9337
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Alaska D1 WCHA SR 36 9 11 20 0.556
2016-17 Alaska D1 WCHA JR 30 3 9 12 0.400
2015-16 Alaska D1 WCHA SO 34 5 4 9 0.265
2013-14 Alaska D1 WCHA FR 33 1 5 6 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2013-14 · Alaska
+22.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6731
Defenseman overall
#1079
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dave McKenna
Elmira · 2004-05
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Wandmacher
Saint John's · 2019-20
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.