IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Sweetman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-01-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 60 4 8 12 0.200 0.1274 0.1322 0.5993 0.6217
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 63 7 11 18 0.286 0.1819 0.1790 0.8562 0.8426
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 34 5 9 14 0.412
2015-16 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 37 3 12 15 0.405
2014-15 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 37 5 15 20 0.540
2013-14 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 38 3 12 15 0.395
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2013-14 · St. Lawrence
+160.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6397
Defenseman overall
#1052
Defenseman born in 1994
#3307
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Hall
New England College · 2017-18
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Sanders
Elmira · 2007-08
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Shade
Wentworth · 2005-06
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.