IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vince Pedrie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-01-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Omaha Lancers USHL 40 0 5 5 0.125 0.0796 0.0825 0.3746 0.3882
2012-13 — USHL 56 3 15 18 0.321 0.2047 0.2012 0.9631 0.9468
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 36 5 9 14 0.389 0.2477 0.2319 1.1654 1.0912
2014-15 — USHL 62 13 16 29 0.468 0.2978 0.2642 1.4016 1.2434
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 39 8 22 30 0.769
2015-16 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 32 8 14 22 0.688
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2015-16 · Penn State
+189.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2171
Defenseman overall
#565
Defenseman born in 1994
#2077
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stuart Stefan
Castleton · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Seltenreich
New England · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Berry
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.