IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vince Pedrie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-01-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Omaha Lancers USHL 40 0 5 5 0.125 0.0737 0.0764 0.3754 0.3890
2012-13 — USHL 56 3 15 18 0.321 0.1896 0.1864 0.9653 0.9489
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 36 5 9 14 0.389 0.2294 0.2148 1.1680 1.0936
2014-15 — USHL 62 13 16 29 0.468 0.2759 0.2448 1.4047 1.2461
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 39 8 22 30 0.769
2015-16 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 32 8 14 22 0.688
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2015-16 · Penn State
+212.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4502
Defenseman overall
#825
Defenseman born in 1994
#2079
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Maxwell Donohoe
Neumann · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stuart Stefan
Castleton · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonny Ruiz
Johnson & Wales · 2014-15
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.