IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johnny Wingels Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chicago Steel USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Chicago Steel USHL 24 0 7 7 0.292 0.1858 0.1831 0.8741 0.8612
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Miami D1 NCHC FR 10 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#4803
Defenseman overall
#884
Defenseman born in 1994
#2978
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Italiano
Williams · 2011-12
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Davidson
Wesleyan · 2021-22
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Cannizzaro
Hobart · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.