icepath.io · Hockey Analytics

← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikita Kashirsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-01-25 Country: Russia

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2004-05	South Shore Kings	EJHL	54	29	22	51	0.944	0.2798	0.2663	—	—
2012-13	Spartak Moskva	KHL	1	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2008-09	Norwich	D3	—	SR	25	17	17	34	1.360
2007-08	Norwich	D3	—	JR	28	20	22	42	1.500
2006-07	Norwich	D3	—	SO	28	17	9	26	0.929
2005-06	Norwich	D3	—	FR	29	19	23	42	1.448

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.23

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

1.45

2005-06 · Norwich

+535.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17666

Forward overall

#548

Forward born in 1985

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG

→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)

0.25 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Ryan Siiro

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG

→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)

0.29 Average

NCAAe PPG

Cullen Hurley

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG

→ Wisconsin

0.21 No data

NCAAe PPG

Alexander Dahl

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG

→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)

0.21 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Tyler Deresky

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG

→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)

0.27 Developing

NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.