icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Metropolitan Riveters | PHF | 18 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.556 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Metropolitan Riveters | PHF | 16 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 1.375 | — | — | — | — |
| 2018-19 | Metropolitan Riveters | PHF | 16 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.250 | — | — | — | — |
| 2024-25 | MoDo Hockey | SDHL | 14 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.143 | 0.1650 | 0.1051 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | RPI | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 34 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 0.706 |
| 2014-15 | RPI | D1 | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2013-14 | RPI | D1 | — | — | 32 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.625 |
| 2012-13 | RPI | D1 | — | — | 36 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 0.750 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.