IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Brossman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Vernon Vipers BCHL 45 11 9 20 0.444 0.1712 0.1736 0.6458 0.6548
2007-08 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 55 9 18 27 0.491 0.2896 0.2749 1.4697 1.3953
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 27 11 16 27 1.000
2010-11 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 28 14 12 26 0.929
2009-10 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 29 10 24 34 1.172
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.17
2009-10 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+484.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21883
Forward overall
#779
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabe Randel
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Libonati
Becker · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Shade
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.