IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Terry Broadhurst Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-11-30 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
TPS · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 56 7 16 23 0.411 0.2423 0.2388 1.2335 1.2158
2008-09 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 60 27 31 58 0.967 0.5703 0.5366 2.9034 2.7318
2015-16 — SHL 48 6 8 14 0.292 0.7293 0.6897 3.8063 3.5996
2016-17 KooKoo Liiga 53 14 22 36 0.679 1.6980 1.5628 5.8385 5.3738
2022-23 Augsburger Panther DEL 54 10 18 28 0.518 1.2962 0.9491 4.3959 3.2188
2023-24 TPS Liiga 16 2 0 2 0.125 0.3125 0.1771 1.0745 0.6088
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Nebraska Omaha D1 CCHA-orig JR 38 16 20 36 0.947
2010-11 Nebraska Omaha D1 CCHA-orig SO 30 11 19 30 1.000
2009-10 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 42 13 11 24 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2009-10 · Nebraska Omaha
+59.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2968
Forward overall
#131
Forward born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Connolly
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rihards Marenis
Aurora · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Day
Endicott · 2024-25
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.