Terry Broadhurst Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-11-30 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2007-08	Sioux Falls Stampede	USHL	56	7	16	23	0.411	0.2423	0.2388	1.2100	1.1926
2008-09	Sioux Falls Stampede	USHL	60	27	31	58	0.967	0.5703	0.5366	2.8481	2.6798
2015-16	—	SHL	48	6	8	14	0.292	0.7293	0.6897	—	—
2016-17	KooKoo	Liiga	53	14	22	36	0.679	1.6980	1.5628	—	—
2022-23	Augsburger Panther	DEL	54	10	18	28	0.518	1.2962	0.9491	—	—
2023-24	TPS	Liiga	16	2	0	2	0.125	0.3125	0.1771	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2011-12	Nebraska Omaha	D1	CCHA-orig	JR	38	16	20	36	0.947
2010-11	Nebraska Omaha	D1	CCHA-orig	SO	30	11	19	30	1.000
2009-10	Nebraska Omaha	D1	—	FR	42	13	11	24	0.571

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.36

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.57

2009-10 · Nebraska Omaha

+59.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

98%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2915

Forward overall

#125

Forward born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Signoretti

Buffalo State · 2023-24

1.120 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Ryan Reifler

Elmira · 2017-18

1.067 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Zach Dill

Salem State · 2021-22

1.111 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.