← New Search ↗ Social Card

McKenna Brand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-18 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Boston Pride · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Park Rapids High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 37 14 51 2.125 0.3413 0.3654
2018-19 Boston Pride PHF 16 6 11 17 1.062
2019-20 Boston Pride PHF 24 19 17 36 1.500
2020-21 Boston Pride PHF 7 3 4 7 1.000
2021-22 Boston Pride PHF 20 5 10 15 0.750
2022-23 Boston Pride PHF 24 4 8 12 0.500
2023-24 Boston Pride PHF 24 4 8 12 0.500
2024-25 Boston Pride PHF 24 4 8 12 0.500
2025-26 Boston Pride PHF 24 4 8 12 0.500
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Northeastern D1 HEA-W 39 15 19 34 0.872
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HEA-W 37 23 15 38 1.027
2015-16 Northeastern D1 HEA-W 38 10 11 21 0.553
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2015-16 · Northeastern
+76.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1595
Forward overall
#68
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Providence ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.