IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brittany Wheeler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 24 18 22 40 1.667 0.2677 0.2677 — —
2011-12 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 25 12 30 42 1.680 0.2698 0.2698 — —
2012-13 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 25 28 30 58 2.320 0.3726 0.3726 — —
2013-14 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 25 15 39 54 2.160 0.3469 0.3469 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Yale D1 ECAC-W — 28 0 1 1 0.036
2015-16 Yale D1 ECAC-W — 27 2 1 3 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2015-16 · Yale
-63.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1638
Forward overall
#103
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Karlie Lund
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG
→ Princeton (1.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Haley Mack
Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Corbin Boyd
Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.