IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alev Baysoy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 25 17 19 36 1.440 0.2174 0.2348 — —
2011-12 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 24 31 21 52 2.167 0.3272 0.3392 — —
2012-13 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 23 18 14 32 1.391 0.2101 0.2101 — —
2013-14 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 21 22 17 39 1.857 0.2804 0.2704 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Princeton D1 ECAC-W — 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#2272
Forward overall
#89
Forward born in 1996
#205
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Abby Hansberger
Concordia Wisconsin · 2024-25
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Claire Casey
Franklin Pierce · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Adriana Urban
Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.