← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Mikan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-03 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 28 14 12 26 0.929 0.1176 0.1176 0.2255 0.2255
2024-25 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 31 18 36 54 1.742 0.2205 0.2205 0.4229 0.4229
2025-26 Red Deer Rebels WHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2026-27 Powell River Kings BCHL 7 5 3 8 1.143 0.4404 0.4404 1.6622 1.6622
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10766
Forward overall
#274
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Harvard
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.89
actual FR PPG at Harvard
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.53
actual FR PPG at Harvard
BCHL 2012-13
0.19
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2007-08
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.