IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Mikan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-03 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 28 14 12 26 0.929 0.1176 0.1176 0.2256 0.2256
2024-25 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 31 18 36 54 1.742 0.2205 0.2205 0.4231 0.4231
2025-26 Red Deer Rebels WHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10563
Forward overall
#252
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ben MacDonald
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.47
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Matt Coronato
NE-Prep 2018-19
1.06
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Casey Severo
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.30
actual FR PPG at Harvard
R.J. Murphy
USHL 2016-17
0.13
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Payne
Concordia · 2006-07
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Fitzpatrick
Marian · 2005-06
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.