← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Rapuzzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-05 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Sport · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 58 21 30 51 0.879 0.5405 0.5405 2.5906 2.5907
2018-19 Sport Liiga 58 13 7 20 0.345 0.8620 0.7529
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig 42 15 20 35 0.833
2011-12 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig 35 3 12 15 0.429
2010-11 Colorado College D1 WCHA-orig 43 12 10 22 0.512
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.50
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.51
2010-11 · Colorado College
+1.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 36 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2758
Forward overall
#129
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.