icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Choate | NE-Prep-Girls | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Choate | NE-Prep-Girls | 26 | 13 | 23 | 36 | 1.380 | 0.6349 | 0.6349 | — | — |
| 2017-18 | SDE HF | SDHL | 35 | 18 | 8 | 26 | 0.743 | 0.8580 | 0.8099 | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Luleå HF | SDHL | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.500 | 0.5775 | 0.5775 | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Leksands IF | SDHL | 26 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 0.808 | 0.9329 | 0.7233 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Yale | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 25 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 0.960 |
| 2015-16 | Yale | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 25 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.680 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.