Based on 19 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Choate | NE-Prep-Girls | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2012-13 | Choate | NE-Prep-Girls | 26 | 13 | 23 | 36 | 1.380 | 0.4482 | 0.4482 |
| 2017-18 | SDE HF | SDHL | 35 | 18 | 8 | 26 | 0.743 | 0.8688 | 0.8201 |
| 2019-20 | Luleå HF | SDHL | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.500 | 0.5847 | 0.5847 |
| 2021-22 | Leksands IF | SDHL | 26 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 0.808 | 0.9446 | 0.7324 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Yale | ECAC-W | SO | 25 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 0.960 |
| 2015-16 | Yale | ECAC-W | FR | 25 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.680 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shayna Tomlinson | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG | 0.531 | Rensselaer |
| Caitrin Lonergan | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG | 0.892 | Boston College |
| Jessie Aney | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG | 0.267 | UConn |
| Brooke Avery | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG | 0.062 | New Hampshire |
| Nicole Schammel | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG | 0.611 | Minnesota State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celia Midtbo | 2021-22 · 2.08 PPG | 0.667 | Saint Mary's | MIAC |
| Emma Schmitz | 2017-18 · 2.08 PPG | 0.667 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Kristina Press | 2017-18 · 2.08 PPG | 0.667 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Emma Peterson | 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG | 0.552 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Taylor Thompson | 2015-16 · 1.16 PPG | 1.185 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.