← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brooke Stacey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-28 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Montréal Force · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Linköping HC SDHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.5775 0.5946
2019-20 Buffalo Beauts PHF 14 8 8 16 1.143
2020-21 Buffalo Beauts PHF 6 0 1 1 0.167
2022-23 Montréal Force PHF 24 2 7 9 0.375
2023-24 Montréal Force PHF 24 2 7 9 0.375
2024-25 Montréal Force PHF 24 2 7 9 0.375
2025-26 Montréal Force PHF 24 2 7 9 0.375
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Maine D1 HEA-W 36 13 17 30 0.833
2016-17 Maine D1 HEA-W 30 15 13 28 0.933
2015-16 Maine D1 HEA-W 35 9 9 18 0.514

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 25 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Yale (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Brown (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.