IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caroline English

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Tabor NE-Prep-Girls 26 2 1 3 0.120 0.0552 0.0552 — —
2007-08 Tabor NE-Prep-Girls 24 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Tabor NE-Prep-Girls 23 1 0 1 0.040 0.0184 0.0184 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Holy Cross D1 — SR 27 7 16 23 0.852
2010-11 Holy Cross D1 — SO 23 10 18 28 1.217
2009-10 Holy Cross D1 — FR 26 7 18 25 0.962
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2009-10 · Holy Cross
+3285.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14890
Forward overall
#1342
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Haley Mullins
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Becca Gilmore
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (1.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Stella Haberman
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Anna Johnson
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sharon Frankel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Haley Mullins
Harvard ·
0.306 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Becca Gilmore
Harvard ·
1.167 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stella Haberman
RIT ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.