IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kailey Bubier

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Hebron NE-Prep-Girls 32 1 1 2 0.060 0.0372 0.0372 — —
2007-08 Hebron NE-Prep-Girls 22 3 2 5 0.230 0.1427 0.1427 — —
2008-09 Hebron NE-Prep-Girls 25 24 18 42 1.680 1.0424 1.0424 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Southern Maine D3 — SR 25 11 4 15 0.600
2011-12 Southern Maine D3 — JR 23 5 4 9 0.391
2010-11 Southern Maine D3 — SO 27 13 2 15 0.556
2009-10 Southern Maine D3 — FR 26 16 10 26 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.64
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2009-10 · Southern Maine
+57.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1273
Forward overall
#98
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Erin Conway
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.48 PPG
→ Brown (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Average
NCAAe PPG
Theresa Knutson
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.09 Average
NCAAe PPG
Maria Lindh
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.90 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erin Conway
Brown ·
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Theresa Knutson
UConn ·
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Maria Lindh
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.306 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.