IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Julia Ireland

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Greenwich Academy NE-Prep-Girls 25 13 6 19 0.760 0.4716 0.4716 — —
2006-07 Greenwich Academy NE-Prep-Girls 26 17 15 32 1.230 0.7632 0.7632 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 1 2 0 2 2.000
2008-09 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 24 8 6 14 0.583
2007-08 Middlebury D3 NESCAC FR 26 5 3 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.60
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2007-08 · Middlebury
-48.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#788
Forward overall
#67
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooke Remington
Franklin Pierce · 2016-17
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Morgan Mordini
Elmira · 2017-18
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Claire Casey
Franklin Pierce · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.