IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Brown

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Arizona State
D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep-Girls 17 9 6 15 0.880 0.5460 0.5460 — —
2010-11 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep-Girls 11 20 4 24 2.180 1.3527 1.3527 — —
2011-12 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep-Girls 3 2 0 2 0.670 0.4157 0.4157 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 13 0 3 3 0.231
2014-15 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 13 1 6 7 0.538
2013-14 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#184
Forward overall
#15
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

McKenzie Rich
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kaylee Wood
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Maddie McCollins
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.