← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Madison Sialtsis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
Robert Morris
Verbal CHA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.21
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2499
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.77
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.9030
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

22%
NCAA D1W
15%
NCAA D3W
62%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 Whitby Wolves OWHL-U22 41 9 16 25 0.610 0.2136 0.2136
2025-26 Whitby Wolves OWHL-U22 46 15 21 36 0.783 0.2741 0.2741
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Liz Schepers USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG 0.410 Ohio State
Paige Voight USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG 0.559 Merrimack
Amy Petersen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG 0.784 Penn State
Mariah Gardner USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG 0.071 Minnesota State
Emily Gunderson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG 0.171 Lindenwood

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Carley Daly 2018-19 · 1.41 PPG 0.704 Amherst NESCAC
Aimee Briand 2011-12 · 1.22 PPG 0.810 Castleton NEHC
Maddie Kolbow 2015-16 · 1.56 PPG 0.633 Hamline MIAC
Ari Smith 2012-13 · 2.46 PPG Elmira UCHC
Hadley Malcolmson 2016-17 · 2.70 PPG 0.364 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.