← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Anabel Seyrer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-22 Country: Germany
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.14
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1596
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.49
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5768
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

30%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
65%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 OHA Mavericks Tardiff U22 OWHL-U22 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0700 0.0706
2025-26 OHA Mavericks Tardiff U22 OWHL-U22 39 9 16 25 0.641 0.2245 0.2190
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Jacqueline Kaasa USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG 0.143 Bemidji State
Aly Tremblay USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG 0.030 RPI
Nicole Guagliardo USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG 0.156 Mercyhurst
Danielle Marmer 19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG 0.108 Quinnipiac
Katie Detert USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG 0.000 St. Cloud State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Samantha Pool 2023-24 · 0.96 PPG 0.800 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Ashley Wagenbach 2023-24 · 1.19 PPG 0.636 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Alexa Niccum 2023-24 · 0.67 PPG 1.133 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Lauren Ballinger 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG 0.556 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Annalee Holzer 2024-25 · 1.50 PPG 0.500 St. Norbert NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.