icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Austin Bruins | NAHL | 29 | 19 | 6 | 91.4% | 2.39 | 1 | 0.9843 | 85.9% |
| 2025-26 | Madison Capitols | USHL | 1 | 0 | 1 | 90.9% | 3.03 | 0 | 0.9983 | 83.7% |
| 2024-25 | — | AJHL | 43 | 15 | 23 | 90.3% | 3.60 | 1 | 0.9700 | 85.3% |
| 2023-24 | — | BCHL | 31 | 11 | 14 | 88.3% | 4.07 | 2 | 0.9990 | 89.5% |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henry Levy | BCHL | 91.8% | 86.0% | Arizona State | 100.0% | — |
| Carter Clafton | NAHL | 91.9% | 86.2% | Air Force | 100.0% | — |
| Cole Plowman | MJHL | 93.4% | 85.4% | Alaska Fairbanks | 100.0% | — |
| Ryan Keane | NAHL | 92.7% | 86.8% | UConn | 100.0% | — |
| Andrew Takacs | NAHL | 91.8% | 86.0% | Colgate | 81.8% | 4.32 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastian Woods | NCDC | 90.6% | 85.9% | Manhattanville | D3 | 91.4% | 3.07 |
| Matthew Dore | USPHL-Premier | 94.4% | 85.8% | Rivier | D3 | 88.8% | 4.78 |
| Avery Rovira | EHL | 90.1% | 86.0% | Elmira | D3 | 88.9% | 3.91 |
| Ford DeLoss | NCDC | 90.0% | 85.7% | Stevenson | D3 | 88.9% | 3.00 |
| Blake Carlson | USPHL-Premier | 94.7% | 86.6% | Framingham State | D3 | 91.9% | 3.26 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.