IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Hawthorne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1998-09-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — BCHL 46 17 25 91.8% 2.95 3 0.9990 87.6%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2022-23 Canisius D1 13 4 4 91.2% 2.66 1
2021-22 Canisius D1 10 3 1 93.5% 2.32 0
2020-21 Northern Michigan D1 4 0 1 87.2% 4.59 0
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 17 5 5 88.2% 3.10 1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Gergely Orosz NAHL 91.9% 87.8% Alaska Anchorage 91.5% 2.75
Beni Halasz NAHL 92.1% 87.8% Northern Michigan 91.9% 2.32
Jackson Fuller NAHL 92.9% 88.7% Northern Michigan — —
Rorke Applebee BCHL 90.2% 86.5% Lake Superior State 90.7% 3.00
Malachi Klassen MJHL 91.7% 85.4% Holy Cross — 3.04
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Matthew O'Donnell NAHL 88.6% 87.2% Aurora D3 91.0% 2.97
Nolan Suggs NAHL 90.1% 88.6% Adrian D3 92.4% 1.75
Liam Kilgallen EHL 90.8% 88.2% Framingham State D3 86.4% 4.74
Tyler Roy EHL 91.3% 87.9% Neumann D3 87.2% 3.68
Jacob Jaslow NCDC 90.7% 88.1% Roger Williams D3 91.0% 3.49

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.