IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Fessenden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1998-04-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — NAHL 44 20 13 91.5% 2.74 2 0.9843 82.6%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2023-24 Canisius D1 22 7 11 89.7% 3.35 0
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 25 7 14 91.1% 2.65 1
2021-22 New Hampshire D1 9 2 4 90.9% 2.19 —
2020-21 Alabama-Huntsville D1 16 3 11 91.0% 2.94 1
2019-20 Alabama-Huntsville D1 7 0 4 86.9% 4.44 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Salvatore Evola NAHL 91.7% 82.9% Bowling Green 86.2% 4.25
Justen Close SJHL 92.8% 82.4% Minnesota 78.6% 6.09
Joshua Seeley NAHL 90.0% 81.6% Bentley 82.6% 8.58
Austin Roden BCHL 91.2% 81.1% Nebraska Omaha 90.7% 2.87
Ajeetpal Gundarah BCHL 93.1% 83.6% Sacred Heart 93.6% 1.90
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Will Augustine USPHL-Premier 94.0% 82.5% Rivier D3 91.5% 2.97
Jack Fialkoff NAHL 89.0% 82.8% Trinity D3 89.3% 2.68
Christian Green MJHL 91.8% 83.3% Neumann D3 93.6% 1.97
Jadon Lee USPHL-Premier 93.3% 82.1% Lebanon Valley D3 93.0% 2.59
Noel Olsonawski MJHL 91.2% 82.3% Concordia D3 92.8% 2.05

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.