| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | — | SJHL | 41 | 25 | 11 | 92.8% | 2.19 | 3 | 0.9700 | 82.4% |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Minnesota | D1 | 38 | 22 | 10 | 92.3% | 2.36 | 4 |
| 2022-23 | Minnesota | D1 | 37 | 26 | 10 | 92.7% | 2.02 | 6 |
| 2021-22 | Minnesota | D1 | 21 | 14 | 5 | 92.5% | 1.95 | 3 |
| 2020-21 | Minnesota | D1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 71.4% | 6.00 | 0 |
| 2019-20 | Minnesota | D1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 78.6% | 6.09 | 0 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owen Say | BCHL | 92.3% | 82.7% | Mercyhurst | 90.3% | 3.39 |
| David Fessenden | NAHL | 91.5% | 82.6% | Alabama-Huntsville | 86.9% | 4.44 |
| Joshua Seeley | NAHL | 90.0% | 81.6% | Bentley | 82.6% | 8.58 |
| William Gramme | NAHL | 91.9% | 83.7% | Wisconsin | 95.9% | 1.13 |
| Brendan Holahan | NAHL | 89.7% | 82.1% | Union | 85.7% | 4.48 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Malin | AJHL | 90.7% | 82.1% | St. Olaf | D3 | 90.6% | 2.47 |
| Jadon Lee | USPHL-Premier | 93.3% | 82.1% | Lebanon Valley | D3 | 93.0% | 2.59 |
| Colby Muise | AJHL | 91.6% | 81.9% | Marian | D3 | 93.2% | 1.77 |
| Will Augustine | USPHL-Premier | 94.0% | 82.5% | Rivier | D3 | 91.5% | 2.97 |
| Josh Koziol | NA3HL | 93.3% | 81.2% | Augsburg | D3 | 71.4% | 5.76 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.