icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
Vancouver Canucks
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | — | USHL | 47 | 18 | 18 | 88.9% | 3.01 | 1 | 0.9983 | 89.3% |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Minnesota Duluth | D1 | 18 | 3 | 11 | 90.4% | 3.14 | 0 |
| 2022-23 | Minnesota Duluth | D1 | 19 | 8 | 9 | 90.5% | 2.64 | 1 |
| 2021-22 | Maine | D1 | 12 | 1 | 8 | 88.8% | 3.11 | — |
| 2020-21 | Maine | D1 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 87.8% | 4.23 | 0 |
| 2019-20 | Maine | D1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% | 25.59 | 0 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carsen Musser | USHL | 90.5% | 90.5% | Colorado College | 87.9% | 3.94 |
| Mathis Langevin | QMJHL | 91.2% | 91.3% | Miami | 93.8% | 2.00 |
| Kaidan Mbereko | USHL | 89.8% | 90.6% | Colorado College | 92.5% | 2.30 |
| Ben Kraws | USHL | 89.5% | 90.4% | Miami | 87.1% | 4.12 |
| Jere Huhtamaa | SM-Liiga-Jr | 90.3% | 88.3% | Merrimack | 86.4% | 3.47 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brody Haynes | NCDC | 92.5% | 92.3% | Elmira | D3 | 94.8% | 1.22 |
| Cooper Rautenstrauch | NCDC | 90.6% | 92.2% | Colby | D3 | 93.4% | 2.08 |
| Cooper Rautenstrauch | NAHL | 88.9% | 92.2% | Colby | D3 | 93.4% | 2.08 |
| Nevin Tardif | USPHL-Premier | 90.4% | 87.8% | Worcester State | D3 | 89.8% | 3.54 |
| Vaughn Makar | NAHL | 90.9% | 94.0% | St. Norbert | D3 | 93.2% | 1.73 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.