← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Trotter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2001-04-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2021-22 BCHL 37 20 11 91.4% 2.24 2 0.9990 80.8%
2020-21 BCHL 11 7 3 93.4% 1.63 2 0.9990 93.3%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 14 7 5 91.0% 2.39 1
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Cole Plowman MJHL 93.4% 80.7% Alaska Fairbanks 100.0%
Henry Levy BCHL 91.8% 80.8% Arizona State 100.0%
Austin Roden BCHL 91.2% 81.1% Nebraska Omaha 90.7% 2.87
Ryan Keyes NCDC 92.6% 79.7% Merrimack 92.0% 2.22
Joshua Seeley NAHL 90.0% 81.6% Bentley 82.6% 8.58
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Logan Palmer USPHL-Premier 92.1% 80.5% Western New England D3 90.9% 3.11
Evan Crawford USPHL-Premier 95.0% 82.0% Lebanon Valley D3
Jacob Gorinsky OJHL 89.9% 80.7% Norwich D3 83.3% 5.00
Dean Hahn USPHL-Premier 91.6% 80.0% Salem State D3 88.9% 3.95
Noel Olsonawski MJHL 91.2% 82.3% Concordia D3 92.8% 2.05

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.