IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Sochan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2002-07-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2022-23 — BCHL 17 10 7 90.6% 3.11 2 0.9990 82.1%
2021-22 — EHL 4 2 2 91.2% 4.34 0 0.9400 88.7%
2021-22 — NCDC 2 0 1 89.1% 5.36 0 0.9400 83.8%
2021-22 — NAHL 1 0 1 33.3% 15.75 0 0.9843 33.0%
2021-22 — USHL 3 0 1 80.5% 5.07 0 0.9980 76.2%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2023-24 Robert Morris D1 1 0 0 100.0% — 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Adam Manji BCHL 90.4% 82.2% American International 92.1% 2.70
Colin Winn BCHL 90.2% 82.5% St. Lawrence 88.3% 4.50
Brendan Holahan NAHL 89.7% 82.1% Union 85.7% 4.48
Nick Bevilacqua NCDC 94.8% 83.4% Bentley 95.2% 0.99
Malachi Klassen MJHL 91.7% 82.2% Holy Cross — 3.04
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Braedyn McIntosh BCHL 91.9% 82.2% Aurora D3 91.7% 3.09
Kevin Lake NA3HL 95.1% 82.8% Hamline D3 91.7% 2.54
Cole Defazio OJHL 89.7% 82.7% Neumann D3 90.7% 3.57
Kevin Lake NAHL 87.9% 82.8% Hamline D3 91.7% 2.54
Dylan Grover OJHL 90.4% 82.2% St. John Fisher D3 91.3% 2.94

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.