IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Lake Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1998-07-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — NA3HL 8 8 0 95.1% 1.53 0 0.9400 81.0%
2018-19 — NAHL 8 2 5 87.9% 3.93 0 0.9843 80.6%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2022-23 Hamline D3 22 11 11 91.4% 2.89 —
2021-22 Hamline D3 22 4 15 88.5% 3.45 —
2020-21 Hamline D3 4 0 4 90.5% 3.73 0
2019-20 Hamline D3 6 2 2 91.7% 2.54 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Adam Manji BCHL 90.4% 82.2% American International 92.1% 2.70
Michael Sochan BCHL 90.6% 82.1% Robert Morris 100.0% —
Max Hildebrand WHL 91.8% 79.7% Bemidji State 89.5% 2.71
Brandon Bussi USHL 91.5% 79.8% Western Michigan 91.0% 2.65
Ben Bonisteel OJHL 92.6% 79.9% Canisius 89.3% 3.10
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
John Simon NA3HL 92.1% 81.0% Post D2 91.6% 3.15
Dane Couture MJHL 86.5% 80.8% Concordia D3 87.3% 2.94
Emil Norrman USPHL-Premier 91.3% 81.2% Buffalo State D3 93.1% 2.30
Karl Zodda NA3HL 92.0% 79.9% Chatham D3 86.8% 4.66
Dylan Boughen USPHL-Premier 90.6% 79.8% Rivier D3 62.5% 14.86

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.