icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
Washington Capitals
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | — | NTDP-U18 | 37 | 23 | 7 | 89.7% | 2.99 | 3 | 0.9200 | 78.5% |
| 2023-24 | USNTDP Juniors | USHL | 18 | 10 | 4 | 87.0% | 3.88 | 0 | 0.9980 | 91.9% |
| 2022-23 | — | NTDP-U18 | 27 | 15 | 11 | 86.6% | 4.04 | 2 | 0.9200 | 81.5% |
| 2022-23 | — | USHL | 18 | 7 | 9 | 83.4% | 5.10 | 1 | 0.9980 | 93.9% |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Notre Dame | D1 | 34 | 9 | 19 | 89.3% | 3.55 | 1 |
| 2024-25 | Notre Dame | D1 | 13 | 2 | 10 | 89.5% | 3.74 | 0 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trey Augustine | NTDP-U18 | 92.6% | 81.1% | Michigan State | 91.5% | 2.96 |
| Trey Augustine | NTDP-U18 | 92.6% | 81.1% | Michigan | 91.5% | 2.96 |
| Spencer Knight | NTDP-U18 | 91.3% | 80.8% | Boston College | 93.1% | 1.97 |
| Tyler Muszelik | NTDP-U18 | 90.0% | 81.2% | New Hampshire | 88.3% | 3.24 |
| Mikhail Yegorov | USHL | 89.2% | 94.4% | Boston University | 92.7% | 2.15 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brody Haynes | NCDC | 92.5% | 92.3% | Elmira | D3 | 94.8% | 1.22 |
| Nevin Tardif | USPHL-Premier | 90.4% | 88.0% | Worcester State | D3 | 89.8% | 3.54 |
| Cooper Rautenstrauch | NCDC | 90.6% | 93.8% | Colby | D3 | 93.4% | 2.08 |
| Cooper Rautenstrauch | NAHL | 88.9% | 94.0% | Colby | D3 | 93.4% | 2.08 |
| Zach Dosan | NA3HL | 92.1% | 87.8% | Gustavus Adolphus | D3 | 72.5% | 6.60 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.