← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Holahan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2004-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2024-25 NAHL 21 8 11 89.7% 3.17 0 0.9843 82.1%
2023-24 AJHL 16 15 1 91.6% 1.72 1 0.9700 86.4%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Union D1 3 0 1 85.7% 4.48 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Cooper Black BCHL 92.4% 82.9% Dartmouth 89.9% 3.07
Owen Say BCHL 92.3% 82.7% Mercyhurst 90.3% 3.39
Adam Manji BCHL 90.4% 82.2% American International 92.1% 2.70
Noah Pak OJHL 94.5% 81.2% Yale 87.2% 3.86
Justen Close SJHL 92.8% 82.4% Minnesota 78.6% 6.09
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Dylan Kruss NCDC 88.5% 81.6% Lake Forest D3 91.8% 2.84
Dylan Grover OJHL 90.4% 82.2% St. John Fisher D3 91.3% 2.94
Joseph Giacobbo CCHL 91.8% 82.8% Utica D3 95.3% 0.90
Cam Prodin USPHL-Premier 93.6% 81.8% Roger Williams D3 75.8% 9.18
Freddy Soderberg USPHL-Premier 93.1% 82.6% Fitchburg State D3 93.0% 2.48

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.