icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | — | AJHL | 8 | 4 | 2 | 87.4% | 3.06 | 2 | 0.9700 | 79.4% |
| 2018-19 | — | BCHL | 16 | 11 | 4 | 89.3% | 3.21 | 0 | 0.9990 | 83.9% |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Babson | D3 | 23 | 15 | 6 | 93.9% | 1.69 | — |
| 2021-22 | Babson | D3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 86.9% | 3.19 | — |
| 2020-21 | Babson | D3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 98.0% | 0.50 | 1 |
| 2019-20 | Babson | D3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 87.8% | 3.82 | 0 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mason Kucenski | USHL | 84.9% | 78.3% | St. Lawrence | 82.6% | 8.00 |
| Lucas Massie | USHL | 87.9% | 81.1% | Union | 80.5% | 5.73 |
| Andrew Oke | OHL | 87.6% | 80.8% | Lake Superior State | 87.9% | 3.95 |
| Connor Hasley | USHL | 86.7% | 79.7% | Bentley | 91.0% | 2.95 |
| Gavin Moffatt | USHL | 89.3% | 82.4% | Western Michigan | — | — |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bodee Weiss | BCHL | 87.9% | 80.7% | Aurora | D3 | 87.9% | 2.93 |
| Dolan Gilbert | NA3HL | 91.0% | 81.2% | Concordia | D3 | 81.0% | 9.00 |
| Chris Branch | USPHL-Premier | 84.7% | 77.4% | Lebanon Valley | D3 | 89.3% | 4.36 |
| Cameron Hrdlicka | SJHL | 89.6% | 83.0% | Concordia | D3 | 89.0% | 3.97 |
| Hayden Williamson | OJHL | 85.8% | 82.1% | Arcadia | D3 | 92.0% | 3.36 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.