← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles Watson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2003-12-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2023-24 EHL 24 17 6 93.2% 2.21 1 0.9400 87.1%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Castleton D3 10 88.7% 3.82 0
2024-25 Castleton D3 5 1 4 89.7% 3.70 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Tyler Krivtsov NAHL 90.8% 87.7% Alaska Anchorage 89.2% 3.12
Ethan David BCHL 90.9% 88.0% RIT 90.9% 2.68
Max Lacroix NAHL 91.4% 88.4% Boston University 87.2% 3.59
Julian Molinaro AJHL 91.6% 85.8% Northern Michigan 95.7% 1.81
Sam Scopa NAHL 89.7% 86.9% Quinnipiac 100.0%
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Caleb Chabot CCHL 89.1% 86.6% Albertus Magnus D3 93.4% 1.79
Tyler Laureault CCHL 90.6% 87.6% St. Olaf D3 88.7% 3.36
Mason Meyer USPHL-Premier 92.8% 87.3% Rivier D3 91.4% 2.07
Collin Lemanski NA3HL 93.6% 86.1% St. Norbert D3 100.0%
Riley Mastowski EHL 89.9% 88.0% Franklin Pierce D2 89.4% 3.80

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.