← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikita Volsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2004-05-29 Country: Belarus
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2024-25 NAHL 19 16 3 93.1% 2.13 1 0.9843 88.1%
2023-24 NCDC 18 11 6 92.5% 2.49 2 0.9400 86.6%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Western New England D3 12 89.5% 4.42 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Ajeetpal Gundarah BCHL 93.1% 88.0% Sacred Heart 93.6% 1.90
Owen Say BCHL 92.3% 87.2% Mercyhurst 90.3% 3.39
William Gramme NAHL 91.9% 86.9% Wisconsin 95.9% 1.13
Cooper Black BCHL 92.4% 87.4% Dartmouth 89.9% 3.07
Jack Spicer NAHL 93.5% 88.2% Sacred Heart 100.0%
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Austin McNicholas NAHL 91.6% 89.1% Suffolk D3 91.0% 2.04
Christopher Jackson NCDC 92.2% 88.8% Suffolk D3 84.7% 4.78
Cameron Carroll NCDC 91.9% 88.1% Saint Anselm D2 91.2% 3.22
Matthew Malin AJHL 90.7% 86.5% St. Olaf D3 90.6% 2.47
Christian Green MJHL 91.8% 87.6% Neumann D3 93.6% 1.97

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.