IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Say Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2001-06-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2021-22 — BCHL 38 23 10 92.3% 2.44 3 0.9990 82.7%
2020-21 — BCHL 16 7 6 90.7% 2.82 0 0.9990 90.6%
2019-20 — NOJHL 36 31 2 94.1% 1.90 3 0.9700 91.3%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2024-25 Notre Dame D1 27 10 15 92.0% 2.82 0
2023-24 Mercyhurst D1 31 8 17 91.3% 3.22 0
2022-23 Mercyhurst D1 11 4 6 90.3% 3.39 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Cooper Black BCHL 92.4% 82.9% Dartmouth 89.9% 3.07
Brendan Holahan NAHL 89.7% 82.1% Union 85.7% 4.48
Justen Close SJHL 92.8% 82.4% Minnesota 78.6% 6.09
Noah Pak OJHL 94.5% 81.2% Yale 87.2% 3.86
William Gramme NAHL 91.9% 83.7% Wisconsin 95.9% 1.13
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Joseph Giacobbo CCHL 91.8% 82.8% Utica D3 95.3% 0.90
Cam Prodin USPHL-Premier 93.6% 81.8% Roger Williams D3 75.8% 9.18
Matthew Malin AJHL 90.7% 82.1% St. Olaf D3 90.6% 2.47
Freddy Soderberg USPHL-Premier 93.1% 82.6% Fitchburg State D3 93.0% 2.48
Sam Edmands USPHL-Premier 93.4% 83.0% Post D2 93.9% 2.10

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.