IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Melissa Haganey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-26 Country: USA Height: 5'4" (163 cm)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Connecticut Polar Bears 19U 19U-AAA-W 32 8 15 23 0.719 0.2448 0.2477 — —
2012-13 Connecticut Polar Bears 19U 19U-AAA-W 29 12 4 16 0.552 0.1879 0.1859 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HEA-W — 33 0 1 1 0.030
2015-16 Northeastern D1 HEA-W — 38 3 3 6 0.158
2014-15 Northeastern D1 HEA-W — 29 4 2 6 0.207
2013-14 Northeastern D1 HEA-W — 35 2 3 5 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2013-14 · Northeastern
-20.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3557
Forward overall
#105
Forward born in 1994
#126
in 19U-AAA-W

D1 Comparables

Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kaleigh Martinson
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jamie Bird
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hailey Rock
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.