Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | New Ulm High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.280 | 0.0423 | 0.0423 |
| 2020-21 | New Ulm High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 20 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.700 | 0.1057 | 0.1057 |
| 2021-22 | New Ulm High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 1.370 | 0.2069 | 0.2069 |
| 2022-23 | New Ulm High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 0.963 | 0.1454 | 0.1420 |
| 2023-24 | New Ulm High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 12 | 18 | 30 | 1.111 | 0.1678 | 0.1568 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Bethel | MIAC | FR | 26 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.308 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mekenzie Steffen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG | 0.350 | Wisconsin |
| Lauren Boyle | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG | 0.486 | Ohio State |
| Kate Hallett | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.100 | Harvard |
| Katie Robinson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.129 | Minnesota |
| Izzy Bagi | 19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG | 0.556 | Holy Cross |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shelby Evans | 2023-24 · 0.93 PPG | — | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Jana Lesch | 2022-23 · 1.69 PPG | 0.222 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Logan Harper | 2013-14 · 1.31 PPG | 0.292 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC |
| Renee Ng | 2023-24 · 0.38 PPG | 1.042 | Wilkes | UCHC |
| Sam Mugge | 2014-15 · 0.96 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.