IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch Zion Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-07 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Carleton Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 57 16 30 46 0.807 0.1750 0.1914 0.6244 0.6830
2009-10 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 53 7 9 16 0.302 0.1781 0.1846 0.9067 0.9396
2010-11 Cornwall Colts CCHL 45 18 29 47 1.044 0.2265 0.2261 0.8081 0.8067
2012-13 Cornwall Colts CCHL 43 17 43 60 1.395 0.3026 0.2732 1.0795 0.9746
2013-14 Carleton Univ. USports-M 23 5 8 13 0.565 0.2982 0.3151 1.6566 1.7507
2014-15 Carleton Univ. USports-M 26 10 11 21 0.808 0.4261 0.4282 2.3674 2.3791
2015-16 Carleton Univ. USports-M 28 6 15 21 0.750 0.3957 0.3782 2.1982 2.1007
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2011-12 · Clarkson
-57.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9361
Forward overall
#389
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Gravelle
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.