| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Lincoln Stars | USHL | 45 | 24 | 26 | 50 | 1.111 | 0.6830 | 0.6339 | 3.2735 | 3.0382 |
| 2008-09 | Ässät | Liiga | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.250 | 0.6250 | 0.5506 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | SR | 42 | 25 | 29 | 54 | 1.286 |
| 2003-04 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 41 | 21 | 14 | 35 | 0.854 |
| 2002-03 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 42 | 12 | 17 | 29 | 0.691 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.