← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor McCloy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-08-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Caledon Admirals OJHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0409 0.0439 0.1148 0.1233
2011-12 Aurora Tigers OJHL 48 24 14 38 0.792 0.1940 0.1998 0.5451 0.5613
2012-13 Aurora Tigers OJHL 55 17 23 40 0.727 0.1783 0.1747 0.5007 0.4906
2013-14 Aurora Tigers OJHL 50 27 36 63 1.260 0.3088 0.2868 0.8675 0.8057
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 30 24 14 38 1.267
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 28 10 15 25 0.893
2015-16 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 29 13 16 29 1.000
2014-15 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 12 4 14 18 1.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.50
2014-15 · Adrian
+624.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16574
Forward overall
#579
Forward born in 1993
#564
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2021-22
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.