| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Caledon Admirals | OJHL | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.167 | 0.0466 | 0.0500 | 0.1150 | 0.1235 |
| 2011-12 | Aurora Tigers | OJHL | 48 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 0.792 | 0.2212 | 0.2278 | 0.5464 | 0.5626 |
| 2012-13 | Aurora Tigers | OJHL | 55 | 17 | 23 | 40 | 0.727 | 0.2032 | 0.1991 | 0.5019 | 0.4918 |
| 2013-14 | Aurora Tigers | OJHL | 50 | 27 | 36 | 63 | 1.260 | 0.3520 | 0.3269 | 0.8695 | 0.8076 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | SR | 30 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 1.267 |
| 2016-17 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | JR | 28 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0.893 |
| 2015-16 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | SO | 29 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 1.000 |
| 2014-15 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | FR | 12 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 1.500 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.