← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Kilah Hodder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-11-27 Country: Canada Height: 5'7" (171 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
Merrimack
Verbal HEA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — HEA-W
0.13
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1652
Conf. Strength1.157
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.50
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5321
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

2%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
92%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 3 16 19 0.633 0.1451 0.1468
2025-26 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 29 2 21 23 0.793 0.1817 0.1775
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kendra Nealey USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG 0.212 Cornell
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota
Mekenzie Steffen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.350 Wisconsin

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Lauren Ballinger 2022-23 · 1.04 PPG 0.556 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Sadie Baker 2013-14 · 1.09 PPG 0.538 Hamline MIAC
Rylan Kissel 2023-24 · 0.96 PPG 0.577 Bethel MIAC
Bailey Vesper 2024-25 · 1.44 PPG 0.393 Saint Benedict MIAC
Mollie Koch 2023-24 · 1.36 PPG — Saint Mary's MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.