Justin Florek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-18 Country: USA

2010 · Round 5, Pick #135 ·

Boston Bruins

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2006-07	U.S. National U17 Team	NTDP-U18	66	21	11	32	0.485	0.3604	0.3740	1.8090	1.8773
2007-08	—	NTDP-U18	56	8	8	16	0.286	0.2124	0.2083	1.0661	1.0457
2018-19	Iserlohn Roosters	DEL	52	10	11	21	0.404	1.0095	1.0239	3.4235	3.4722
2023-24	Dresdner Eislöwen	DEL2	13	6	3	9	0.692	0.9274	0.6298	1.2423	0.8437

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2011-12	Northern Michigan	D1	CCHA	SR	37	19	17	36	0.973
2010-11	Northern Michigan	D1	CCHA	JR	39	14	15	29	0.744
2009-10	Northern Michigan	D1	CCHA	SO	41	12	23	35	0.854
2008-09	Northern Michigan	D1	CCHA	FR	40	9	8	17	0.425

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.23

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.42

2008-09 · Northern Michigan

+80.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

95%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13846

Forward overall

#557

Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Rihards Marenis

Aurora · 2024-25

1.000 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Logan Day

Endicott · 2024-25

1.333 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brendan Bell

Hamilton · 2010-11

0.333 Developing

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.