IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Lorenz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-03-10 Country: USA
2008 · Round 4, Pick #115  ·  Minnesota Wild Minnesota Wild
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 USNTDP Juniors NAHL 45 1 7 8 0.178 0.0653 0.0730 0.1877 0.2099
2007-08 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 43 2 4 6 0.140 0.1037 0.1007 0.5205 0.5056
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig SR 39 3 10 13 0.333
2010-11 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig JR 44 4 11 15 0.341
2009-10 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 34 2 1 3 0.088
2008-09 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 40 0 3 3 0.075
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2008-09 · Notre Dame
-11.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18283
Defenseman overall
#1747
Defenseman born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Trevor Hamilton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Piccininno
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Todd
Lebanon Valley · 2002-03
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Haskins
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.